Connecticut Attorney General George Jepsen is offering no false assurances about his state’s legal right to authorize a ‘satellite casino’ 13 miles from the MGM Springfield in Massachusetts.
The issues that are legal the proposal are complex and uncertain, he said in a letter to Governor Dannel Malloy.
Connecticut AG George Jepsen is uncertain that a casino project created to blunt competition through the MGM Springfield could endure future constitutional challenges that are legal.
MGM Resorts has attempted to sue Connecticut over the enactment of its ‘Special Act 15-7,’ which established the procedure that allowed their state’s two tribal gaming operators to find a number municipality for the proposed border casino.
Since this could be a commercial casino situated outside tribal lands, the MGM lawsuit claimed the the Special Act was in violation of equal protection guarantees and the commerce clause, enshrined in the United States Constitution.
Basically, had Connecticut really desired to establish a casino that is commercial should have opened the method up to all commercial operators and not only its two federally recognized tribes, the Mohegans and the Mashantucket Pequots.
Connecticut has made little secret for the reality the key purpose of the casino could be to deflect competition through the MGM Springfield to counteract the effect that is detrimental would have by itself casino indus Lire la suite